Manuel D`utilisation Caméra Zr85

friends Lopedé

Yesterday, reconvened in the cafeteria meal the Club of Friends of the Lopedé What I can say that has not already said in Twitter? This time there was carrot cake (from a certain age, the lawyer lopedé must start taking care).

Finally, at the meeting, we talked a bit of everything. Of course, we spent a few minutes to discuss the procedures for enforcing that the Agency open to Google. For @ Compliancero is absurd to try to bring an American company to an open process in the English courts, as much as the company in question offers its services to customers located in our territory.

For his part, @ hectorguzmanmx said the agency should have been activated to the FTC, since although the Data Protection Act does not apply, Google Inc is an entity attached to the principles safe harbor. We also raised interesting questions regarding the responsibility of Official Gazettes, which knew no answer. It really is difficult to determine who is responsible for the file constituted by the BOE, the body responsible for publication or who determines the content to appear on it (ministries, local authorities, private ...). Probably the most successful is the former.

This morning, Don Hector has left us in his time line links on the Google issue.

I think everyone agreed that he should not be required to English company removing links and that these legal guardianships are poorly addressed. Friends of Lopedé supporters are more regular publication of data on the website of origin, provided that this is possible.

Another topic of interest was the video surveillance, which led us to the question of what constitutes domestic activities. jfgarcicu @ explained the definition of the National Court in the famous dictum of Military Academy of Zaragoza, and @ setelaw said some decisions in which companies have been punished for using cameras that record at an angle of 360 degrees. For Indeed, @ setelaw offered to prepare a presentation for the next meeting (I suggested the subject of the notice to debtors through social networks). I said that the agency had passed many times individuals who had placed cameras at home, and that these resolutions are maintained because was cheaper to pay the fine to resort to the Court. Here Paco, began to accuse me of anti-system, and literally said that every time lowers his head to finish a report on security measures, I escaped to the latter.

@ Compliancero surprised everyone (especially Paco) for his knowledge of business communication through social networks (and their great ideas on this). He said a case of success, Sanitas, which has launched a campaign related to health which provides information on healthy diet.

As all good things, the meeting ended soon. For those who missed, just tell them one thing: they arrive at my house I asked my will and an eraser.